From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Nov 23 17:46:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40AA237B406 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 17:46:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97EFF43E91 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 17:46:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from owt.com (owt-207-41-94-232.owt.com [207.41.94.232]) by rutger.owt.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA09024; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 17:46:43 -0800 Message-ID: <3DE02F83.6050407@owt.com> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 17:46:43 -0800 From: Kent Stewart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, es-mx MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stacey@vickiandstacey.com Cc: Lefteris Tsintjelis , a , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Port INDEX dependency list incompletes References: <3DDF911D.5FF8F512@ene.asda.gr> <3DDF9EFC.E3B42B5D@ene.asda.gr> <20021123170312.3af58fdd.a@grunix.com> <3DDFA761.D459E000@ene.asda.gr> <3DDFCA8A.40104@owt.com> <3DDFE0AC.57BF260E@ene.asda.gr> <3DDFE4D6.5090901@owt.com> <1038093287.43256.12.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Stacey Roberts wrote: > Hi Kent, > I wanted to square with you that this is as one would expect from > "make index" and "portsdb -u" at the end of cvsup of ports tree: > # make index > Generating INDEX - please wait..Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: > freeciv-imlib-1.13.0 > Done. > #portsdb -u > [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 7860 port > entries found > .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000.........6000.........7000........ ..... done] > # > > Is the one warning there about freeciv-imlib-1.13.0 being duplicated > okay? I ask as this is usually the last entry in my regular portsdb -Uu > after cvsup'ing ports tree. Kris told me that it was because I had imlib installed, which I did. I also figured that one message about a port I didn't use was much better than screens of messages about ports I did use :). Kent > > Regards, > > Stacey > > On Sat, 2002-11-23 at 20:28, Kent Stewart wrote: > >>Lefteris Tsintjelis wrote: >> >>>Kent Stewart wrote: >>> >>> >>>>cd /usr/ports >>>>make index >>>>portsdb -u >>> >>> >>>I get almost always "dependency list incompletes" with portsdb -Uu. >>>Would it be a good idea to always use the above instead? >> >>No, because portsdb -U uses much less computer time to rebuild INDEX >>than make index does. On my AMD 2000+ XP, which is designed to do 20 >>minute buildworlds, a portsdb -U requires ~7 minutes and a make index >>requires ~11 minutes. If you are going to work on your ports, the >>extra time is time you just sit there. I find people go into their own >>version of an idle-loop after 2 minutes. >> >>We just have to wait for knu to fix it. >> >>KEnt > -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message