From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Apr 4 00:23:59 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA26021 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 00:23:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA26011 for ; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 00:23:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by root.com (8.8.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id AAA10379; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 00:24:26 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199704040824.AAA10379@root.com> X-Authentication-Warning: implode.root.com: localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: ee96199@tom.fe.up.pt cc: spork , Steve Hovey , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux vs freebsd testimonial In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 04 Apr 1997 08:39:47 GMT." From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Fri, 04 Apr 1997 00:24:26 -0800 Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >I am considering upgrading from 16MB to 32MB of RAM... I thing that >FreeBSD will get much faster because it will use plenty of cache and >buffers. Anyone agrees? If you are using X heavily, then yes, 32MB does work much better. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project