Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 21:05:15 +0100 From: Emiel Kollof <coolvibe@hackerheaven.org> To: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: many copies of make running while building a port... Message-ID: <AD38EEA1-15BC-11D6-9663-000A277C7FDE@hackerheaven.org> In-Reply-To: <20020130182737.GS92289@dan.emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dan Nelson heeft op woensdag 30 januari 2002 om 19:27 het volgende geschreven: >> Number of procs in top(1) shoot up into the ranges of 600+ procs (and >> usually defunct). Load average sometimes jumps up into the 100+ (I >> kid you not). I doubt that that is desired operation. I only started >> seeing this behavior when I switched over to CURRENT, but this mail >> is cc'd to ports@ too, just in case. It makes using portupgrade(1) as >> tense as a good thriller flick (will my system survive? The >> suspense!) > > I've had that happen when I put typos in /etc/make.conf (i.e. syntax > errors or HAVE_/WANT_ variables that don't belong there). > Hmm, curious. The symptoms disappeared when I commented the line USE_GCC30=TRUE out of my make.conf. I switched it on because I read on the current@ list that someone enabled it and didn't have any problems... Is USE_GCC30 actually supported? Should I just keep my hands off that? Or will it be a valid knob to switch over in the near future? Cheers, Emiel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AD38EEA1-15BC-11D6-9663-000A277C7FDE>