From owner-freebsd-current Sun Nov 7 11:21:52 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (castles527.castles.com [208.214.165.91]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454EE14C87 for ; Sun, 7 Nov 1999 11:21:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA13326; Sun, 7 Nov 1999 11:12:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199911071912.LAA13326@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: "Daniel C. Sobral" Cc: Thierry Herbelot , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: stuck with ~year old current In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 07 Nov 1999 21:16:32 +0900." <38256DA0.F684B854@newsguy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 07 Nov 1999 11:12:49 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > > "We do not support upgrading to -current from anything else than the > > > latest -stable." > > > > Does this still hold after the recent signal changes ? > > > > TfH > > > > (I assume Yes, if one first upgrade the kernel, then the world) > > You assume correctly. -stable loader can load -current kernel. Well, > it could until very recently. I don't know if the new stuff Mike is > doing will introduce any incompatibility. The last incompatibility was around March or so, when the load address of the kernel changed. Anything postdating that is basically equi-functional. -- \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message