From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 12 14:29:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE06816A402 for ; Sat, 12 May 2007 14:29:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1666B13C44B for ; Sat, 12 May 2007 14:29:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 12 May 2007 10:00:48 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.3-GA) with ESMTP id IQO31958; Sat, 12 May 2007 10:00:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 65-78-26-179.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([65.78.26.179]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 12 May 2007 10:00:46 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17989.51344.598557.303580@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 10:00:48 -0400 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <464476D3.3090001@freebsd.org> References: <464476D3.3090001@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fancy rc startup (revisited) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 14:29:25 -0000 Eric Anderson writes: > Here's some kind of bad ones from a qemu session (ignore those > calcru errors which I can't seem to get rid of): > > http://www.googlebit.com/freebsd/patches/rc_fancy_screenshots/ 1) All I see here are instances where things work. What does it look like when things are _not_ "[ OK ]"? 2) (Having not installed the patch) Do all entries look the same? Could one, e.g., cause stuff run from /usr/local/etc/rc.d to appear in a different color? Robert Huff