From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Jun 20 06:23:34 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id GAA19583
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 20 Jun 1995 06:23:34 -0700
Received: from whisker.internet-eireann.ie (whisker.internet-eireann.ie [194.9.34.204])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id GAA19577
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 Jun 1995 06:23:23 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whisker.internet-eireann.ie (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id OAA13454; Tue, 20 Jun 1995 14:23:12 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: whisker.internet-eireann.ie: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: Steven Wallace <swallace@balboa.eng.uci.edu>
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: to be 2.1 or not to be 2.1? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 20 Jun 1995 00:53:55 PDT."
             <199506200754.AA23411@balboa.eng.uci.edu> 
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 1995 14:23:12 +0100
Message-ID: <13452.803654592@whisker.internet-eireann.ie>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freebsd.org>
Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

2.2 is just what's under development as "-current".  2.1 is a
stability release and will only have incremental improvements from
2.0.5R made to it.

						Jordan

> 
> Umm, I noticed on freefall: -current tree now tracking FreeBSD 2.2.
> 
> Also some talk on -hackers about 2.2.  I'm sorry if I missed something,
> but what happened to 2.1?
> 
> Steven
>