Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 22:52:47 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: standards/63173: Patch to add getopt_long_only(3) to libc Message-ID: <200402230352.i1N3qluf062405@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20040223033628.GA41038@nagual.pp.ru> References: <200402221620.i1MGKBRH001589@freefall.freebsd.org> <200402230237.i1N2bffP061911@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20040223033628.GA41038@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 06:36:29 +0300, Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> said: > The question is really about 3rd party non-standard headers, like GNU > ones. I.e. Should we protect all contents there with __XSI_VISIBLE, > __POSIX_VISIBLE too or not? An application including a non-POSIX (or non-ISO) header has no expectation of receiving a POSIX (ISO) namespace. -GAWollman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200402230352.i1N3qluf062405>