Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 20 Nov 2012 17:04:56 +0400
From:      Alexander Zhuravlev <a.zhuravlev@gmail.com>
To:        Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi@niif.hu>
Cc:        freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Recent security announcement and csup/cvsup?
Message-ID:  <20121120130456.GA22418@zmac>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1211201239110.26940@strudel.ki.iif.hu>
References:  <20121117150556.GE24320@in-addr.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1211171705170.32838@m.fuglos.org> <20121118180421.GF24320@in-addr.com> <20121120100148.GA93826@roberto-aw.eurocontrol.fr> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1211201239110.26940@strudel.ki.iif.hu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:45:19PM +0100, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
> Dear Ollivier and all,
> 	I have problem with the portsnap: I maintain a private "repository"
> under the /usr/ports: There is a /usr/ports/tmp where I store new
> ports to be tested, and submitted. The portsnap is removing
> unrecognized local files.

MacPorts has a really nice feature of Local Portfile Repositories:
http://guide.macports.org/chunked/development.local-repositories.html

I assume FreeBSD ports system can be modified to have something like
this (to have a list of port directories which can be modified by, for
example, defining local ports tree via /etc/make.conf).

> 	With cvsup I don't have such a problem.
> 	I have no information about pkgng, whether I can maintain private
> repository with pkgng or not?
> 
> Janos Mohacsi
> Head of HBONE+ project
> Network Engineer, Director Network and Multimedia
> NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
> Co-chair of Hungarian IPv6 Forum
> Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F  4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882
> 
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> 
> >According to Gary Palmer on Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 01:04:21PM -0500:
> >>In other words: while signed updates via freebsd-update and portsnap
> >>are great for a good chunk of users, they don't address everyones needs.
> >
> >Hopefully, with the move toward kngng, there will be less need of portsnap (and /usr/ports for that matter).
> >
> >-- 
> >Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.net
> >In memoriam to Ondine, our 2nd child: http://ondine.keltia.net/
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
> >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
> >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> >
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
-- 
Alexander Zhuravlev



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121120130456.GA22418>