From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 13 20:43:15 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B0D7F16A4CE; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:43:15 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0CE0F43D46; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:43:15 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6DKhBUU025077;
	Tue, 13 Jul 2004 22:43:11 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 13 Jul 2004 14:33:42 MDT."
             <20040713.143342.17590193.imp@bsdimp.com> 
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 22:43:11 +0200
Message-ID: <25076.1089751391@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org
cc: src-committers@freebsd.org
cc: scottl@freebsd.org
cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org
cc: nate@root.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/kldunload kldunload.8 kldunload.c 
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:43:15 -0000

In message <20040713.143342.17590193.imp@bsdimp.com>, "M. Warner Losh" writes:

>: >Frankly, I dislike your obstructionist attitudes towards newbus.
>: 
>: Obstructionist ?  That's a pretty harsh word for somebody who has
>: wasted a couple of months trying to write a newbus-ified GEOM.
>
>It just seems that whenever the topic of newbus comes up, you don't
>want to use it.

Can we just say that having tried it out in a couple of the areas
where people keep saying it should go, I appreciate the size of the
gap between what newbus can today and what it needs to learn before
the fully newbusified kernel can be a realistic dream.

That is not obstructionist, that is being realistic.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.