From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 10 10: 4:12 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from misha.cisco.com (misha.cisco.com [171.69.206.50])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 70BE514C03; Mon, 10 Jan 2000 10:04:09 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mi@misha.cisco.com)
Received: (from mi@localhost)
	by misha.cisco.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id NAA34213;
	Mon, 10 Jan 2000 13:03:50 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mi)
Message-Id: <200001101803.NAA34213@misha.cisco.com>
Subject: Re: When does the 4.x branch go stable?
In-Reply-To: <20000110094834.D94525@relay.nuxi.com> from "David O'Brien" at "Jan
 10, 2000 09:48:34 am"
To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 13:03:50 -0500 (EST)
Cc: Coleman Kane <cokane@one.net>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Reply-To: mi@aldan.algebra.com
From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL60 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

David O'Brien once wrote:
 
> WHY do  you need  to make  world with GCC  2.95.2? Gcc  2.7.2 acutally
> produces smaller  code. For some things  even faster code. What  is so
> glammorous about a Gcc 2.95 built world and kernel?

FYI, I  put together  the http://virtual-estates.net/bm/ ,  although the
latest was 2.95.1 back then.

	-mi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message