From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Apr 16 14:10:14 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80CEC16A403
	for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 14:10:14 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from benlutz@datacomm.ch)
Received: from maxlor.mine.nu (c-213-160-32-54.customer.ggaweb.ch
	[213.160.32.54])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7E0B43D53
	for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 14:10:12 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from benlutz@datacomm.ch)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by maxlor.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 051D52E09D;
	Sun, 16 Apr 2006 16:10:11 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at atlantis.intranet
Received: from maxlor.mine.nu ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (atlantis.intranet [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id gt48+AGLFKAl; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 16:10:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mini.intranet (mini.intranet [10.0.0.17])
	by maxlor.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC9452E066;
	Sun, 16 Apr 2006 16:10:10 +0200 (CEST)
From: Benjamin Lutz <benlutz@datacomm.ch>
To: "Yuri Grebenkin" <breath@unix.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 16:10:04 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3
References: <auto-000000094533@mtsnet.ru>
In-Reply-To: <auto-000000094533@mtsnet.ru>
X-Face: $Ov27?7*N,h60fIEfNJdb!m,@#4T/d;
	1hw|W0zvsHM(a$Yn6BYQ0^SEEXvi8>D`|V*F"=?iso-8859-1?q?=5F+R=0A?=
	2@Aq>+mNb4`,'[[%z9v0Fa~]AD1}xQO3|>b.z&}l#R-_(P`?@Mz"kS;
	XC>Eti,i3>%@g?4f,=?iso-8859-1?q?=5Cc7=7CGh=0A?=
	=?iso-8859-1?q?_wb=26ky=24b2PJ=5E=5C0b83NkLsFKv=7CsmL/cI4UD=25Tu8alAD?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1511785.EmN7QK4Ix9";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200604161610.08089.benlutz@datacomm.ch>
Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why is not more FreeBSD software writ
X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Non technical items related to the community
	<freebsd-chat.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 14:10:14 -0000

--nextPart1511785.EmN7QK4Ix9
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sunday 16 April 2006 17:04, Yuri Grebenkin wrote:
> [...]
> By the way, one can realize OOP-model in C better than in C++ if needed.

That is an interesting statement. I see how you can simulate OOP in C, but =
can=20
you explain how one could realize it better than with C++?

Cheers
Benjamin

--nextPart1511785.EmN7QK4Ix9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBEQlBAgShs4qbRdeQRAnfMAJwOJtmwTMjTbB50XOIOb2MRXGpZXwCZARSb
lMpYhYkJAOuahmfWdkTasfs=
=M5FT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1511785.EmN7QK4Ix9--