From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jan 29 11:52:32 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA02079 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 29 Jan 1999 11:52:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hillbilly.hayseed.net (dnai-207-181-249-194.dsl.dnai.com [207.181.249.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA02070 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 1999 11:52:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from enkhyl@scient.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hillbilly.hayseed.net (8.9.1/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA06431; Fri, 29 Jan 1999 11:52:20 -0800 Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 11:52:16 -0800 (PST) From: Christopher Nielsen X-Sender: enkhyl@ender.sf.scient.com Reply-To: Christopher Nielsen To: "Donald J . Maddox" cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why does tcpdump not see tun0 when loaded as a kld? In-Reply-To: <19990128213212.A2442@dmaddox.conterra.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Donald J . Maddox wrote: > I recently decided to try building a kernel without static tun0, > and use the kld module instead. Unfortunately, I am seeing this: > > # ifconfig -a > lp0: flags=8810 mtu 1500 > ds0: flags=8201 mtu 65532 > inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > tun0: flags=8051 mtu 1500 > inet 209.12.169.48 --> 209.12.169.2 netmask 0xffffff00 > tun1: flags=8010 mtu 1500 > lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > > # tcpdump -i tun0 > tcpdump: tun0: Device not configured > > Does tun0 _have_ to be compiled in statically for tcpdump to see > it? Not from my experience. The loadable module works really well for me. -- Christopher Nielsen Scient: The eBusiness Systems Innovator cnielsen@scient.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message