From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 4 22:49:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A469E85 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 22:49:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B930D118 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 22:49:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r24Mnplp036014 for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 02:49:51 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 02:49:51 +0400 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: carp on stable/9: is there a way to keep jumbo? (fwd) Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Tue, 05 Mar 2013 02:49:51 +0400 (MSK) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 22:49:53 -0000 Collegaues, sorry, sent to the wrong list (the only escuse for me is possibly that I'm trying to make HAST base on carp...) -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 02:31:51 From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: carp on stable/9: is there a way to keep jumbo? Dear collesagues, yes, I know glebius@ overhauled carp in -current, but I'm a bit nervous to deploy bleeding edge system on a NAS/SAN ;) So, my question is about current state of carp in stable/9: building HA pair I found that carp interfaces lose jumbo capabilities: root@cthulhu4:~# ifconfig | grep mtu em0: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu 9000 em1: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu 9000 lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 lagg0: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu 9000 carp0: flags=49 metric 0 mtu 1500 carp1: flags=49 metric 0 mtu 1500 root@cthulhu4:~# ifconfig carp1 mtu 9000 ifconfig: ioctl (set mtu): Invalid argument Is it unavoidable at the moment, or am I missing something obvious? Thanks! -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"