From owner-freebsd-security  Wed May 13 04:49:55 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA14589
          for freebsd-security-outgoing; Wed, 13 May 1998 04:49:55 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from cheops.anu.edu.au (avalon@cheops.anu.edu.au [150.203.76.24])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA14554
          for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 13 May 1998 04:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au)
Message-Id: <199805131149.EAA14554@hub.freebsd.org>
Received: by cheops.anu.edu.au
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA035090129; Wed, 13 May 1998 21:48:49 +1000
From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>
Subject: Re: Why aren't security fixes posted to security-announce?
To: guido@gvr.org (Guido van Rooij)
Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 21:48:49 +1000 (EST)
Cc: fpscha@schapachnik.com.ar, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <199805121925.VAA19992@gvr.gvr.org> from "Guido van Rooij" at May 12, 98 09:25:05 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

In some mail from Guido van Rooij, sie said:
> 
> In general, security related patches are first applied to -current.
> After about a week or so, they are brought to -stable. The an
> advisory will be sent out. Why? Because an advisory without a decently
> tested patch would upset users.

I haven't seen a commit message yet for the mmap bug...


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message