Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 22:03:11 +0200 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> To: Eduardo Meyer <dudu.meyer@gmail.com> Cc: Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov@gmail.com>, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: netmap-ipfw: kipfw two instances sharing same port Message-ID: <CA%2BhQ2%2Bjo1J52E=K_yT0-KO4_zbm-7MnEhvzghchifri8t7RuBA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAEqdE_7cE7VBzRaXwtLod=KmsAvJudSyR--Dn5zhay_19OwGPA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAEqdE_6EEwyMur161KpKqas_gcJb2mnn-Zb_q65%2BObbJD2oePw@mail.gmail.com> <CALgsdbdTxc7T-hxd4LjO940d0RSHW7ttPQ%2BdfBwOGC=FYKow%2Bw@mail.gmail.com> <CAEqdE_4tkzuzdWSS=kHCzJF7yo=-1FxhijjeN2dUVc7fLHuYOg@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BhQ2%2Bh5i5-B6D7fcv1sB-cCNfbu3ije7Ga6W7TO=Qat1MCGKQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAEqdE_7cE7VBzRaXwtLod=KmsAvJudSyR--Dn5zhay_19OwGPA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Eduardo Meyer <dudu.meyer@gmail.com> wrote= : > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Eduardo Meyer <dudu.meyer@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Pavel Odintsov < >>> pavel.odintsov@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Hello! >>> > >>> > You could enable multiple queues for each NIC and run single instance >>> of >>> > kipfw on each pair: >>> > kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0 >>> > kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix1-1 >>> > >>> > And so on ;) i have about 12 mpps with this configuration (on Linux >>> > netmap). >>> > >>> >>> Wow cool hint and cool numbers. >>> >>> I will get everything properly bridged on both kipfw instances, right? >>> >>> I need to simulate like a 3-port bridge... this would me more like >>> >>> kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0 >>> kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix2-0 >>> >>> But I need the same traffic coming on the wire on ix0 to be available o= n >>> both ix1 and ix2. >>> >> >> =E2=80=8Bit won't replicate traffic on the other two ports, >> that's a different logic. >> >> cheers >> luigi >> > > yeah it's what I thought, > different queues, different packets > > what about the first approach? should I expect issues? > > kipfw netmap:ix0 netmap:ix1 > kipfw netmap:ix0 netmap:ix2 > =E2=80=8Bit won't do what anything sensible: processes will compete for packets randomly passing them to one or the other port. =E2=80=8Bcheers luigi=E2=80=8B
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BhQ2%2Bjo1J52E=K_yT0-KO4_zbm-7MnEhvzghchifri8t7RuBA>