From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org  Thu May 26 06:38:54 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7937DB4A32A
 for <freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Thu, 26 May 2016 06:38:54 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 699B11BBE
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 26 May 2016 06:38:54 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4Q6croA003014
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 26 May 2016 06:38:54 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 209729] Defining RLIM_SAVED_MAX and RLIM_SAVED_CUR in
 sys/sys/resource.h according to POSIX.
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 06:38:53 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: standards
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: kib@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to cc component
Message-ID: <bug-209729-8-zIz0KZw9mL@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-209729-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-209729-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 06:38:54 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209729

Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org    |freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.o
                   |                            |rg
                 CC|                            |kib@FreeBSD.org
          Component|kern                        |standards

--- Comment #1 from Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> ---
Is there a consensus that the patch is the right thing to do ?

POSIX specifies that RLIM_SAVED_MAX and RLIM_SAVED_CUR can be same as
RLIM_INFINITY, if all limit values are represented as rlim_t.  Our rlim_t is
64-bit signed (which is already non-conforming), and e.g. RLIMIT_FSIZE file
sizes larger than (1ULL<<63) cannot be represented by our rlim_t without so=
me
strength of interpretation.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=