From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Aug 28 10:12:42 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [209.157.86.2])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCBE61566D
	for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 28 Aug 1999 10:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com)
Received: (from dillon@localhost)
	by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id KAA04963;
	Sat, 28 Aug 1999 10:12:38 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dillon)
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 1999 10:12:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Message-Id: <199908281712.KAA04963@apollo.backplane.com>
To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Should cam_imask be part of bio_imask ?
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

    I'm trying to track down some VFS/BIO corruption on an NFS server
    being tested under heavy loads and noticed that my SCSI interrupts
    do not appear to be blocked by splbio().

	(The adaptec's are on irq 5 and irq 12)

	(kgdb) print bio_imask
	$1 = 0x40080040
	(kgdb) print cam_imask
	$2 = 0x400c1020
	(kgdb) 

    This doesn't sound right to me.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message