From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 18:58:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5714F1065688; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:58:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16848FC1E; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:58:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbta17 with SMTP id ta17so3927906obb.13 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:58:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=roaIdSZnHkMloDskezI3iaC16M5I3R05Sheq5jZcyG8=; b=Uxp255Ktv8VKUE1RF1bJeITZjkpnbIoRpmAOYjCCMgrDNKsxBn198XE5owyKrTXGqf dTIkw8v/Pyr50laUuIdIdHiR7pwGPn9VoEYKhtDYTZWgEB6+yHEnTxZRkEBJTH96d5SC HFcKeo7QBtQn0ZZIC4Xsg4tzNwXUh3S7AFCB0= Received: by 10.50.161.135 with SMTP id xs7mr942161igb.15.1326481132265; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:58:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.207.7 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:58:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <35B3C9CE-0D58-4DDC-AE6D-A6EF450DF39D@bsdimp.com> References: <4F08C95F.6040808@FreeBSD.org> <20120108.081216.1547061187942402256.hrs@allbsd.org> <4F0A22D8.8090206@FreeBSD.org> <20120109.223510.1979757999064039809.hrs@allbsd.org> <4F0FFFF7.4090105@FreeBSD.org> <20120113141058.GE1662@garage.freebsd.pl> <20120113171255.GA1694@garage.freebsd.pl> <35B3C9CE-0D58-4DDC-AE6D-A6EF450DF39D@bsdimp.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:58:21 +0000 Message-ID: To: Warner Losh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org, Doug Barton , Pawel Jakub Dawidek Subject: Re: Making use of set_rcvar. X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:58:53 -0000 On 13 January 2012 18:40, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Jan 13, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Chris Rees wrote: >> Also, I tend to agree with Doug on the <> issue. >> If we really want to reuse code like that then we need to start using >> m4 or something (I'm only being half facetious here). > > Well, nothing is keeping us from having foo.m4 as our source and compiling it into foo... > > Except maybe the fact that m4 makes my eyeballs bleed (I did do my resume with m4 none-the-less :) That was my point. It'd require loads less boilerplate.... Chris