From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 2 19:52:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 498911065673 for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 19:52:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0509B8FC12 for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 19:52:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1SauNc-000C7z-SO; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:52:56 +0200 Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 21:52:56 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Daniel Kalchev Message-ID: <20120602195256.GH5335@home.opsec.eu> References: <20120601121555.GF5335@home.opsec.eu> <4FC8B67D.5090208@digsys.bg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FC8B67D.5090208@digsys.bg> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 19:52:56 -0000 Hi! > For example if one wants an e-mail server, that is better > served in the long run by IMAP+MTA than any form of Exchange, because > you are not tied to one single platform and that vendor's lunacy. In the field, many customers are drawn into the world of Exchange and related technologies because of groupware features that are not easy to replicate without it. Once they are in that world, it's very tough to climb back out. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 8 years to go !