From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr  8 12:34:56 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67BF37B401
	for <questions@FreeBSD.org>; Tue,  8 Apr 2003 12:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lilzcluster.liwest.at (lilzclust02.liwest.at [212.33.55.12])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D5843F3F
	for <questions@FreeBSD.org>; Tue,  8 Apr 2003 12:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dgw@liwest.at)
Received: from CM58-27.liwest.at by lilzcluster.liwest.at
	(8.10.2/1.1.2.11/08Jun01-1123AM)
	id h38JYal0001473644; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 21:34:37 +0200 (MEST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Daniela <dgw@liwest.at>
To: Fabio Miranda Hamburger <fabmirha@ns.isi.ulatina.ac.cr>,
	questions@FreeBSD.org
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 21:35:34 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0304081256570.5524-100000@ns.isi.ulatina.ac.cr>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0304081256570.5524-100000@ns.isi.ulatina.ac.cr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <200304082135.34593.dgw@liwest.at>
Subject: Re: apm
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 19:34:57 -0000

On Tuesday 08 April 2003 21:01, Fabio Miranda Hamburger wrote:
> Hi, according to the documentation, the "apm" utility is "not well
> supported" for freebsd.
> It has been not supported for years.
> so, When is going to be supported?
> Why all the development of freebsd is based on /bin /sbin and kernel?
> I feel like all developers are old unix guru that enjoy console system =
but
> there are not abe to develop a modern and versatile system.
> FreeBSD needs management, ppl that are NOT programmers and understand
> users needs and focus the development.
>
> If the developers prefer to "improve the version of su" they do that an=
d
> dont care about "window's world utility".
> Mobile computing is the future!.


What exactly is a mobile system good for when everyone can get in and mod=
ify=20
your files?
Secure systems are the future!