Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:48:44 +0300 From: Andrew Riabtsev <resident@b-o.ru> To: Dinesh Nair <dinesh@alphaque.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: netgraph questions on ng_tee, ng_iface, ng_socket Message-ID: <1602380953.20040120114844@b-o.ru> In-Reply-To: <20040120012819.I312-100000@prophet.alphaque.com> References: <20040120012819.I312-100000@prophet.alphaque.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Dinesh, Monday, January 19, 2004, 8:29:23 PM, you wrote: DN> On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Andrew Riabtsev wrote: >> DN> connecting the ng_iface hook inet to ng_ether's upper or lower doesnt make >> DN> any sense because ng_ether itself does not do an encasulation of the IP >> DN> packet into an ethernet frame. or am i wrong here, and just configuring it >> DN> wrongly ? >> >> Connecting ng_iface:inet and ng_ether:upper/lower do nothing, well, it >> do something but not what you are waiting for, i think. DN> i know, hence was asking if there was something i could do, even if it DN> meant writing an extension to ng_ether to create a new netgraph type. You could try to write netgraph module that makes same thing with packets and frame as functions ether_(input/output) in net/if_ethersubr.c. Thats all that come in my mind. -- Andrew mailto:resident@b-o.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1602380953.20040120114844>