From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat May  7 21:22:05 2011
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF461065674
	for <cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org>; Sat,  7 May 2011 21:22:05 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com)
Received: from relay01.pair.com (relay01.pair.com [209.68.5.15])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D91D8FC13
	for <cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org>; Sat,  7 May 2011 21:22:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 49161 invoked from network); 7 May 2011 21:22:03 -0000
Received: from 195.135.221.2 (HELO g159.suse.de) (195.135.221.2)
	by relay01.pair.com with SMTP; 7 May 2011 21:22:03 -0000
X-pair-Authenticated: 195.135.221.2
Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 23:22:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <201105072030.p47KUHAu056048@repoman.freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1105072231370.3911@gerinyyl.fvgr>
References: <201105072030.p47KUHAu056048@repoman.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports GIDs
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 May 2011 21:22:05 -0000

On Sat, 7 May 2011, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>   Modified files:
>     .                    GIDs 
>   Log:
>   Fix format of _adsuck entry.
>   
>   Reported by:    portlint

I strongly recommend running portlint before every port update.

This one was a FATAL that suddenly showed up in my own testing of
something totally unrelated, so I was pretty sure it wasn't me (but
still figured I'd address it). ;-)

Gerald