From owner-freebsd-chat  Sun May 11 04:35:02 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA24598
          for chat-outgoing; Sun, 11 May 1997 04:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from X2296 (ppp6470.on.sympatico.ca [206.172.208.62])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA24583
          for <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 11 May 1997 04:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (tim@localhost) by X2296 (8.7.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA00208; Sun, 11 May 1997 07:34:25 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 11 May 1997 07:34:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Tim Vanderhoek <tim@X2296>
Reply-To: ac199@hwcn.org
To: Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de>
cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: SPAMED again: Add LIVE Girls to your website!
In-Reply-To: <19970511121026.NB55638@uriah.heep.sax.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970511073330.167C-100000@X2296>
X-OS: FreeBSD 2.2
X-Mailer: Pine
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 11 May 1997, J Wunsch wrote:

> I don't see why anybody other than spammers should have a major
> interest in knowing who's subscribed to which lists.  (I think `hub'

It can be useful if you are trying to hunt-down someone's
changed email address...  I don't know if that is
justification, but...


--
tIM...HOEk
Whoever told you I had a .signature was lying.