From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 28 01:14:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A6E1065688 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:14:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoot.lafn.org (zoot.lafn.ORG [206.117.18.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 379538FC13 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:14:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (pool-71-109-162-173.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.109.162.173]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m3S1EI4g040924 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:14:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Message-Id: <05B6619C-9771-41EA-B43E-05DB40CB3258@lafn.org> From: Doug Hardie To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:14:16 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.7/6973/Sun Apr 27 13:15:00 2008 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Firewalls X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:14:21 -0000 FreeBSD supports 3 firewalls: IPF, IPFW, and PF. Some time ago (perhaps years) I seem to recall some discussion that one or more of those was better maintained and higher quality than the others. I don't see any indications of this in the handbook. Several years ago I needed to do traffic shaping and used IPFW with dummynet. It worked but the need eventually went away. More recently I needed to incorporate spamd which defaults to PF so I used that. However, now I am back to needing traffic shaping again. I suspect trying to use both PF and IPFW simultaneously will not be a good approach. In addition, there now are instructions for using spamd with IPFW so it appears that either PF or IPFW will do what I need. Is there any additional information available to assist in selecting between those? Thanks.