From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Apr 26  8:25: 7 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from theory1.physics.iisc.ernet.in (theory1.physics.iisc.ernet.in [144.16.71.20])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FEF037BE1B
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 08:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from rsidd@theory2.physics.iisc.ernet.in)
Received: (qmail 1496 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2000 15:24:26 -0000
Received: from theory2.physics.iisc.ernet.in (144.16.71.21)
  by theory1.physics.iisc.ernet.in with SMTP; 26 Apr 2000 15:24:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 867 invoked by uid 211); 26 Apr 2000 22:42:16 -0000
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 04:12:16 +0530
From: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@physics.iisc.ernet.in>
To: Mitch Collinsworth <mkc@Graphics.Cornell.EDU>
Cc: "David J. Kanter" <djkanter@nwu.edu>,
	freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Why does PORTS SUCK so BADLY!?
Message-ID: <20000427041215.A862@physics.iisc.ernet.in>
Mail-Followup-To: Mitch Collinsworth <mkc@Graphics.Cornell.EDU>,
	"David J. Kanter" <djkanter@nwu.edu>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <djkanter@nwu.edu> <200004261219.IAA99550@larryboy.graphics.cornell.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <200004261219.IAA99550@larryboy.graphics.cornell.edu>; from mkc@Graphics.Cornell.EDU on Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 08:19:46AM -0400
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.2.5-15 i486
X-Question: Do you enjoy reading pointless headers?
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Mitch Collinsworth said on Apr 26, 2000 at 08:19:46:
> 
> >Yes, ports do get broken, but usually if you post a message as to what's
> >going on, it's fixed rather quickly.
> 
> Which list is most appropriate for posting (specific) gripes about
> (specific) ports?

freebsd-ports@freebsd.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message