From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Jan 22 02:15:24 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id CAA26992
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 22 Jan 1996 02:15:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id CAA26982
          for <freebsd-hackers@freefall.freebsd.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 1996 02:15:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id CAA00563; Mon, 22 Jan 1996 02:12:14 -0800
Message-Id: <199601221012.CAA00563@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95
To: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
cc: freebsd-hackers@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: stanford benchmark/usenix 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 22 Jan 1996 10:07:03 +0100."
             <199601220907.KAA04508@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 1996 02:12:13 -0800
From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

The whole system would benefit , paging, networking, nfs, etc..
not only that but we will be able to use our pentiums added 
memory bandwith which is currently being wasted 8)


	Cheers,
	Amancio

>>> Luigi Rizzo said:
 > > Do we have pentium optimized bcopy and bzero ?
 > > 
 > > Because some of the benchmarks could clearly benefit from them.
 > 
 > I hope it's not only for the benchmarks!
 > 
 > 	Luigi