From owner-freebsd-current Mon May 25 20:52:28 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA11173 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 25 May 1998 20:52:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from austin.polstra.com (austin.polstra.com [206.213.73.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA11162 for ; Mon, 25 May 1998 20:52:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@austin.polstra.com) Received: from austin.polstra.com (jdp@localhost) by austin.polstra.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA18333; Mon, 25 May 1998 20:52:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp) Message-Id: <199805260352.UAA18333@austin.polstra.com> To: John Birrell cc: tlambert@primenet.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Fix for undefined "__error" and discussion of shared object versioning In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 26 May 1998 13:19:09 +1000." <199805260319.NAA21720@cimlogic.com.au> Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 20:52:18 -0700 From: John Polstra Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > BTW, what's you opinion of egcs? It seems to have frequent ups and downs. We have been using the Feb. 21 snapshot for a fairly large C++ project that I'm involved with, and we haven't had any show-stopper problems. But I believe some of the other team members tried a later snapshot and ran into all sorts of bugs. One thing I can say is that the template support is immeasurably better than what was in gcc-2.7.2. I haven't tried gcc-2.8.1, but I've heard that its C++ support is much improved over 2.7.2 as well. -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Self-knowledge is always bad news." -- John Barth To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message