From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Dec 13 18:52:13 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA16412 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Sun, 13 Dec 1998 18:52:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [209.157.86.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA16407 for ; Sun, 13 Dec 1998 18:52:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id SAA18602; Sun, 13 Dec 1998 18:51:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 18:51:45 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <199812140251.SAA18602@apollo.backplane.com> To: Dmitrij Tejblum Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: misc/9033 Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Uh, I really, really, really doubt that anybody bothers with that specification, especially considering that I've never even heard of it before. 'UNIX' in the sense of AT&T's original trademark is 20 years out of date, anyway. Nobody in their right mind tries to adhere to somthing that old. -Matt : :Matt Dillon wrote: : :> it :> isn't really a bug in UNIX. Most UNIX's have include file dependancies : :UNIX(tm), as specified in the Single Unix Specification, version 2, :doesn't have include file dependecies. See ...../xsh/compilation.html. : :Dima : : : Matthew Dillon Engineering, HiWay Technologies, Inc. & BEST Internet Communications & God knows what else. (Please include original email in any response) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message