Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 11:59:37 -0500 From: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> To: Michael Gmelin <grembo@freebsd.org> Cc: olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de>, Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>, ports-list freebsd <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Berkeley DB 4...4.7 port removals/upgrades may require manual preparation Message-ID: <CACdU%2Bf-D-MYxXYaoCbfPU%2BQuKpq041dSWdgZj0XzRO30_9pouA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20140824142050.5e336477@bsd64.grem.de> References: <53F640EF.7000200@FreeBSD.org> <20140824102826.GB9400@home.opsec.eu> <EB2B24ED-1D62-467B-8870-EEACA8A72281@freebsd.org> <20140824111149.GD9400@home.opsec.eu> <53F9CEDA.4070309@gmx.de> <20140824142050.5e336477@bsd64.grem.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Michael Gmelin <grembo@freebsd.org> wrote: > @Olli: Checking Mk/bsd.databasemk it seems like you're right. It's > quite amusing how this went unnoticed for so long, it has been in > there for eight years :) > As the original author of the USE_BDB code, the USE_BDB=5 had worked in the past. As it is supposed to mean that this port only uses that version of BDB. The code was changed on Aug 21 (r365599) and the author of the new code might have forgot to test this case. -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were maimed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACdU%2Bf-D-MYxXYaoCbfPU%2BQuKpq041dSWdgZj0XzRO30_9pouA>