From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 3 00:17:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08ADF16A420; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 00:17:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doginou@dong.ci0.org) Received: from dong.ci0.org (cognet.ci0.org [80.65.224.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B27D43D45; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 00:17:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doginou@dong.ci0.org) Received: from dong.ci0.org (localhost.ci0.org [127.0.0.1]) by dong.ci0.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k130jLPa000461; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 01:45:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from doginou@dong.ci0.org) Received: (from doginou@localhost) by dong.ci0.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k130jK2Q000460; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 01:45:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from doginou) Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 01:45:20 +0100 From: Olivier Houchard To: Steve Kargl Message-ID: <20060203004520.GA435@ci0.org> References: <200602022035.k12KZjHp013277@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060202234226.GA1956@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060202234226.GA1956@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern tty_pty.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:17:23 -0000 On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 03:42:26PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:35:45PM +0000, Olivier Houchard wrote: > > cognet 2006-02-02 20:35:45 UTC > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: > > sys/kern tty_pty.c > > Log: > > Don't destroy the slave /dev entry until someone figures out why devfs seems > > to behave badly when we do so. > > > > Does this address the issue raised in kern/92742? > Yes it should, the added code won't be executed. Olivier