From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Oct 24 13:02:11 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA05021
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 24 Oct 1998 13:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from mail.kersur.net (mail.kersur.net [199.79.199.3])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA05015
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 24 Oct 1998 13:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from dswartz@druber.com)
Received: from manticore (manticore.druber.com [207.180.95.108])
	by mail.kersur.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id QAA05598;
	Sat, 24 Oct 1998 16:01:26 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19981024160121.009bc430@mail.kersur.net>
X-Sender: druber@mail.kersur.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32)
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 16:01:21 -0400
To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
From: Dan Swartzendruber <dswartz@druber.com>
Subject: Re: 3.0 installation problems 
Cc: "Stephen J. Roznowski" <sjr@home.net>, current@FreeBSD.ORG,
        jkh@time.cdrom.com
In-Reply-To: <199810241905.MAA05523@dingo.cdrom.com>
References: <Your message of "Sat, 24 Oct 1998 14:50:58 EDT."             <199810241850.OAA11330@istari.home.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


Speaking of irritating installation issues: why do I have to install X
to use emacs?  I seem to recall, back in my linux days, that there was
an emacs executable that didn't require X.  The standard emacs binary
requires a bunch of non vty libraries that I don't really want to have
to install on stripped-down servers.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message