From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Sun Mar 25 16:36:40 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6DB6F55FA1; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 16:36:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joerg@bec.de) Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (relay6-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 650086C6ED; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 16:36:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joerg@bec.de) X-Originating-IP: 93.205.161.31 Received: from britannica.bec.de (unknown [93.205.161.31]) (Authenticated sender: joerg@bec.de) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8AF7C000B; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 18:36:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 18:35:34 +0200 From: Joerg Sonnenberger To: rgrimes@freebsd.org Cc: Pedro Giffuni , Mark Peek , svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r331510 - in head: share/man/man4 sys/conf sys/dev/vmware/vmci sys/modules/vmware sys/modules/vmware/vmci Message-ID: <20180325163534.GB23474@britannica.bec.de> References: <8dffed54-3319-d826-5ec1-fd80155a3921@FreeBSD.org> <201803251603.w2PG3KLQ041797@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201803251603.w2PG3KLQ041797@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.0 (2017-09-02) X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 16:36:40 -0000 On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 09:03:20AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > Kirk would have to back me up on this, but my understanding of the > decisions that the UCB Regents legal staff came to was that each > file should have a complete copyright and license clause and any > thing less causes problems because of "seprability", and "alterability" > because of seperate files. Are you talking about a decision made before the USA joined the rest of the civilised world as signee of the Berne Convention? The copyright notice was certainly required at the time. A full license clause is nicer for "stealing" things, but certainly not required. Joerg