From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 24 17:42:48 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3E9F1065673;
	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:42:48 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from qing.li@bluecoat.com)
Received: from plsvl-mailgw-02.bluecoat.com (plsvl-mailgw-02.bluecoat.com
	[199.91.133.12])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1CA8FC08;
	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:42:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from PWSVL-EXCHTS-02.internal.cacheflow.com (unknown [10.2.2.126])
	by plsvl-mailgw-02.bluecoat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5AA200C8;
	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pwsvl-excmbx-05.internal.cacheflow.com
	([fe80::f848:d461:9aa9:59a8]) by PWSVL-EXCHTS-02.internal.cacheflow.com
	([fe80::4910:317f:407:6ecc%14]) with mapi id 14.01.0289.001;
	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:42:48 -0700
From: "Li, Qing" <qing.li@bluecoat.com>
To: Fabien Thomas <fabien.thomas@netasq.com>, "K. Macy" <kmacy@freebsd.org>
Thread-Topic: Some performance measurements on the FreeBSD network stack
Thread-Index: AQHNIhyqmxIlJMdUe0+llxsSqqHVrpaqduMA//+MHgSAAJ5UgP//+4+AgAAEoYD//51DEA==
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:42:47 +0000
Message-ID: <B143A8975061C446AD5E29742C531723C7CA6A@pwsvl-excmbx-05.internal.cacheflow.com>
References: <20120419133018.GA91364@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
	<4F907011.9080602@freebsd.org>
	<20120419204622.GA94904@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
	<B143A8975061C446AD5E29742C531723C7C16A@pwsvl-excmbx-05.internal.cacheflow.com>
	<20120424163423.GA59530@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
	<CAHM0Q_MLRVX09_jeSXmCY0=z5D+pfZgwqt1UGM+hVRU-=-Bbbw@mail.gmail.com>
	<5C2FC09E-1873-4A97-8980-07B336D3DC44@netasq.com>
In-Reply-To: <5C2FC09E-1873-4A97-8980-07B336D3DC44@netasq.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.2.2.106]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>,
	"current@freebsd.org" <current@freebsd.org>,
	"net@freebsd.org" <net@freebsd.org>
Subject: RE: Some performance measurements on the FreeBSD network stack
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:42:49 -0000

> >
> > I have a patch that has been sitting around for a long time due to
> > review cycle latency that caches a pointer to the rtentry (and
> > llentry) in the the inpcb. Before each use the rtentry is checked
> > against a generation number in the routing tree that is incremented
> on
> > every routing table update.
>=20
> Hi Kip,
>=20
> Is there a public location for the patch ?
> What can be done to speedup the commit: testing ?
>=20
> Fabien

I performed extensive review of this patch from Kip, and it was
ready to go. Really good work.=20

Not sure what is stopping its commit into the tree.

--Qing