From owner-cvs-all Sun Mar 26 11:21:55 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from 1Cust32.tnt3.waldorf.md.da.uu.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D280C37BA3B; Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:21:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from green@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 14:21:44 -0500 (EST) From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman X-Sender: green@green.dyndns.org To: Neil Blakey-Milner Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/miscfs/linprocfs linprocfs_misc.c In-Reply-To: <20000326210954.A99953@mithrandr.moria.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote: > On Sun 2000-03-26 (13:59), Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > > > Brian Fundakowski Feldman writes: > > > > [...] Right now, I just don't see the good in linprocfs. > > > > > > It allows me (and tons of other people) to run VMWare without the > > > fakeprocfs.sh hack. But I guess there's no good in that. > > > > I don't see the good in it _if_it_also_loses_every_other_capability_of_procfs_! > > If it's mounted on /compat/linux/proc, it makes a _lot_ of sense. And then when some Linux app wants to use the part of procfs implemented in procfs but not linprocfs? > Neil > -- > Neil Blakey-Milner > nbm@rucus.ru.ac.za -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! / green@FreeBSD.org `------------------------------' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message