From owner-freebsd-current Sun Feb 20 14:20:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD1837C01F; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 14:20:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id OAA42695; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 14:18:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 14:18:23 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway To: "David O'Brien" Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: openssl in -current In-Reply-To: <20000220131813.E14682@dragon.nuxi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 20 Feb 2000, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 12:52:49AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > No, because openssl is compiled differently if rsaref is present or not - > > it's not just a matter of dropping in librsaref.so (we can't always just > > build the version with RSAref stubs because it references symbols in > > librsaref and so binaries don't link). > > It sounds like we haven't made suffient RSAglue with suffient stubs that > are weak symbols. Could be, could be. Like I said, I don't know enough about weak symbols to know whether they'd help. Kris ---- "How many roads must a man walk down, before you call him a man?" "Eight!" "That was a rhetorical question!" "Oh..then, seven!" -- Homer Simpson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message