From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 08:26:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C2316A41F for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 08:26:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC90243D4C for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 08:26:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 12921 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2005 08:04:12 -0000 Received: from dotat.atdotat.at (HELO [62.48.0.47]) ([62.48.0.47]) (envelope-sender ) by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 1 Sep 2005 08:04:12 -0000 Message-ID: <4316BB37.9070901@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 10:26:31 +0200 From: Andre Oppermann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Long References: <1125452228.740.3.camel@arbitor.homelinux.com> <47d0403c05083020044f6ac0be@mail.gmail.com> <4315CEEC.80100@samsco.org> <20050831174631.GE37930@cicely12.cicely.de> <4315F15D.4090209@samsco.org> <20050831221535.GB670@cicely12.cicely.de> <4316370E.4030809@samsco.org> <20050901000216.GD670@cicely12.cicely.de> <43164B88.8010903@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <43164B88.8010903@samsco.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Kyle Brooks , ticso@cicely.de, Ben Kaduk Subject: Re: panic after removing usb flash drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 08:26:34 -0000 Scott Long wrote: > > CAM right now is really geared for parallel SCSI with only 16 targets, > but it should work fine with 2048 targets. A project for CAMng is to > properly support FC fabrics properly as well as iSCSI; in both cases > the max-target-per-bus concept has little meaning and would need > fundamental changes. That's future work, though. Please take SAS fabrics and SAS link bonding into account too when doing this. -- Andre