From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 13:23:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B9FC16A4C9 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:23:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: from ecluster6.tls.net (ecluster6.tls.net [65.196.224.136]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA91013C4BD for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:23:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: (qmail 38971 invoked by uid 89); 10 Jan 2007 13:22:01 -0000 Received: from 208-70-43-96.bb.hrtc.net (HELO ?192.168.0.103?) (ldg%tls.net@208.70.43.96) by auth-ecluster6.tls.net with SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 13:22:01 -0000 Message-ID: <45A4E8B4.6070401@pixelhammer.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:23:00 -0500 From: DAve User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <45A42CF3.4000600@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:23:16 -0000 Jeff Mohler wrote: > Fbsd needs SAN support before it can cope with > virtualization..virtualization requires a lot of disk..spindles..and > FCP/iSCSI is a great way to drive this condensation. > > I mean..when you have to read this list, and see people wonder which > end of a SAN connection owns the responsibility for fsck'ing a SAN > filesystem, I wonder how quickly I can bone up on Linux. Sorry for wasting your time. I'll neither post nor respond on the iSCSI thread any longer. DAve -- Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos for other non-international holidays, but nothing for Veterans? Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible.