Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 15:59:46 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r305288 - head/Mk Message-ID: <20121009155946.GA70759@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20121008061249.GA47691@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <201210042257.q94MvjeY039394@svn.freebsd.org> <20121005202842.GA64496@FreeBSD.org> <20121006080539.GB30675@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <5070A018.9010302@FreeBSD.org> <20121008035621.GA91369@FreeBSD.org> <20121008061249.GA47691@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 08:12:50AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 03:56:21AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > That's because OptionsNG poorly implement mutually exclusive options. I > > hope that eventually dialog's --radiolist would be utilized for proper > > handling, and sane knobs names would be restored. > > > > Sounds like a nice port junior hacker project. > > Not hat junior dialog(1) can't mix radiolist and classic checklist that is > why it doesn't use it, using libdialog(3), it would be easiy to implement, > but that won't be usable for a while (until all supported version of > freebsd has it. Ah, OK, that explains it (lack of radiobuttons now). Is it known what's preventing all supported versions to have working libdialog(3), if we have working dialog(1) already? ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121009155946.GA70759>