From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 24 13:21:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C5B21065675; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:21:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@hoeg.nl) Received: from mx0.hoeg.nl (mx0.hoeg.nl [IPv6:2001:4dd0:ff41::b23f:aa]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A7F8FC0A; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:21:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mx0.hoeg.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 257A32A28CD4; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:21:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:21:54 +0200 From: Ed Schouten To: Andrew Reilly Message-ID: <20100624132154.GT2179@hoeg.nl> References: <201006230238.06831.hselasky@c2i.net> <4C21AE18.4050400@icyb.net.ua> <201006230852.26536.hselasky@c2i.net> <4C21B170.2030903@icyb.net.ua> <4C21B383.2000602@icyb.net.ua> <20100623154531.GB31578@zod.isi.edu> <20100624011509.GI31578@zod.isi.edu> <20100624092337.6bed1f45@ernst.jennejohn.org> <20100624092148.GA6948@duncan.reilly.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2tWkrNKppd65XSnD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100624092148.GA6948@duncan.reilly.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: using cupsd instead of base lpr [was Re: [HEADS UP] Kernel modules don't work properly in FreeBSD 8.1-RC1 (solved)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:21:55 -0000 --2tWkrNKppd65XSnD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Andrew Reilly wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:23:37AM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > in /etc/src.conf - WITHOUT_LPR=3Dyes > >=20 > > and these symbolic links in /usr/bin > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 17 Mar 18 2009 /usr/bin/lp -> /usr/loca= l/bin/lp > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 24 Mar 18 2009 /usr/bin/lpoptions -> /u= sr/local/bin/lpoptions > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18 Mar 18 2009 /usr/bin/lpq -> /usr/loc= al/bin/lpq > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18 Mar 18 2009 /usr/bin/lpr -> /usr/loc= al/bin/lpr > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 19 Mar 18 2009 /usr/bin/lprm -> /usr/lo= cal/bin/lprm > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Mar 18 2009 /usr/bin/lpstat -> /usr/= local/bin/lpstat > >=20 > > and /usr/bin is _before_ /usr/local/bin in my PATH. >=20 > Since you have /usr/local/bin in your path, why bother with > the symlinks at all? Your shell will find them in their new > locations just fine. You'll want to remove the old ones from > /usr/bin, but make delete-old will probably do that nicely > anyway. In theory, yes. In practice, no. Just for fun, remove your /usr/sbin/sendmail while having Postfix's /usr/local/sbin/sendmail installed. It simply won't work. If I remember correctly, you won't even receive the periodic(8) emails. Nowadays it's probably better, but I remember in the old days GNOME would always print through /usr/bin/lpr, even when CUPS is installed. --=20 Ed Schouten WWW: http://80386.nl/ --2tWkrNKppd65XSnD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkwjW/IACgkQ52SDGA2eCwWhnwCeOZsoyNCKkpXCQNkmHuIYDbdo UpMAnRevo7UfWpC6p3puyYUqsKbAYZGE =lUUd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2tWkrNKppd65XSnD--