From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 20 17:27:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29FCA16A4CE; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:27:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (blackend.org [212.11.35.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F53843D41; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:27:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i8KHRYMU048209; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:27:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@abigail.blackend.org) Received: (from marc@localhost) by abigail.blackend.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i8KHRX7r048208; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:27:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc) Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:27:33 +0200 From: Marc Fonvieille To: Giorgos Keramidas Message-ID: <20040920172733.GC47164@abigail.blackend.org> References: <20040918.161309.35654157.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> <20040919105246.GW1538@submonkey.net> <200409191740.06579.so14k@so14k.com> <200409191905.56649.so14k@so14k.com> <20040920110628.GA2493@submonkey.net> <20040920133025.GB38865@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20040920140759.GD2493@submonkey.net> <20040920141604.GA1156@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20040920161246.GA19738@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040920161246.GA19738@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Useless-Header: blackend.org X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.10-PRERELEASE cc: Ceri Davies cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New firewall section (was: Re: HEADS UP: doc/ slush begins) X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:27:39 -0000 On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 07:12:46PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: [...] > > It's great stuff. I most certainly want it in the Handbook for 5.3-RELEASE. > But it's going to take at least a couple of days until I have something to > show you all, and I'm not sure if asking for a delay so close to the tagging > of the doc/ tree for 5.3-RELEASE is reasonable. > > What do you all think? Do we have the time to spend a few days organizing, > enhancing and bringing this new wonderful piece of documentation into the > Handbook? It's a big diff (more than 3000 lines now) and I'm a bit worried > the translators won't really have the time to work on this even if it goes in > CVS tonight. > It's a shame everyone awake just after the doc/ slush announce and not earlier after some reminders :))) Marc