From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr  5 09:12:23 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 17A2837B412; Sat,  5 Apr 2003 09:12:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ip68-14-60-78.no.no.cox.net (ip68-14-60-78.no.no.cox.net
	[68.14.60.78])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2811343FA3; Sat,  5 Apr 2003 09:12:22 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from conrads@ip68-14-60-78.no.no.cox.net)
Received: from ip68-14-60-78.no.no.cox.net (conrads@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	h35HHQvj001744;	Sat, 5 Apr 2003 11:17:26 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from conrads@ip68-14-60-78.no.no.cox.net)
Received: (from conrads@localhost)h35HHQUw001743;
	Sat, 5 Apr 2003 11:17:26 -0600 (CST)	(envelope-from conrads)
Message-ID: <XFMail.20030405111725.conrads@cox.net>
X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.4 on FreeBSD
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20030405104248.conrads@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 11:17:25 -0600 (CST)
Organization: A Rag-Tag Band of Drug-Crazed Hippies
From: Conrad Sabatier <conrads@cox.net>
To: Conrad Sabatier <conrads@cox.net>
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: So then, is fxp working OK again?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 17:12:23 -0000


On 05-Apr-2003 Conrad Sabatier wrote:
> 
> On 05-Apr-2003 Maxime Henrion wrote:
>> 
>> Could you post a complete stack trace?  There's no fxp functions in this
>> (incomplete) trace.  Are you sure the problem you're having now is fxp
>> related ?
> 
> I think you're right.  I built a GENERIC kernel, rebooted without the
> acpi
> module, and it's working fine.
> 
> Finally, I was able to get acpidump to work properly, and created a new
> /boot/acpi_dsdt.aml file.  About to attempt a normal boot now.  Will let
> you know.

OK, it appears it is *definitely* ACPI-related.  I guess I'll just content
myself to disable ACPI for now (since I really don't know what I'm doing
with it anyway).  :-)

The fxp is working fine.  Sorry for the bogus report.

-- 
Conrad Sabatier <conrads@cox.net> - "In Unix veritas"