Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 14:30:53 +0300 From: "Reko Turja" <reko.turja@liukuma.net> To: "Matthew Seaman" <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>, <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: freebsd releases?!?!?!(confused) Message-ID: <40CB37DD3E994EA1BBEB55E30E9398DD@rivendell> In-Reply-To: <4C0B8074.8070004@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <AANLkTilEBUW9ybjB0EiwlFzPLGVK8QreXDJPJKnTN3hX@mail.gmail.com> <4C0B8074.8070004@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-------------------------------------------------- From: "Matthew Seaman" <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 2:03 PM To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: freebsd releases?!?!?!(confused) > STABLE is a development branch: it's called 'STABLE' because it is > expected to run stably. STABLE generally receives continual fixes=20 > and > updates, but these will previously have been tested in the bleeding=20 > edge Isn't STABLE called stable, because the featureset and kernel=20 interface is set, the term has nothing to do with stableness of the OS=20 itself. Running STABLE is equal to running beta, use at your own risk. -Reko=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40CB37DD3E994EA1BBEB55E30E9398DD>