From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 13:30:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFD6F16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:30:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF9A43D53 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:30:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i0DLUBFR031490 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:30:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0DLUBtG031489; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:30:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:30:11 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200401132130.i0DLUBtG031489@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Pav Lucistnik Subject: Re: ports/61290: x11-wm/treewm - build fails while compiling dsimple.c on (re|m)alloc issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pav Lucistnik List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:30:19 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/61290; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Pav Lucistnik To: parv Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/61290: x11-wm/treewm - build fails while compiling dsimple.c on (re|m)alloc issues Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:24:02 +0100 V =FAt, 13. 01. 2004 v 21:49, parv p=ED=B9e: > > It builds fine on my 4.9-STABLE, maybe you should update? >=20 > I have no burning desire to update from 4.8-Realease-p14. If the port > cannot be run on 4.8-Realease-p14, so be it. I was just curiously > interested in checking out this wm. I understand ... > > Also I don't see any errors on that build snipped, only warnings. >=20 > Well, if the build stops, as "make install" Just Won't Work by itself, > is that only a warning? It's still not an error. There could be anything else which failed, after the gcc invocation. Not all commands launched by make is also printed. Next command which probably failed somehow is: rm -f xprop > > Anyway, you should take this with the maintainer >=20 > You mean the real maintainer(s) of treewm, not the FreeBSD ones. Right? I meant ports maintainer, maybe he have deeper knowledge of this particular software. > > (can't reproduce it either). >=20 > Tried on 4.8-Release-p14? I don't have any 4.8-R system with X11 around anymore, sadly. --=20 Pav Lucistnik i have a plan so cunning you could put a tail on it and call it a weasel.