From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 5 15:54:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A22DF1 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 15:54:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ken@kdm.org) Received: from nargothrond.kdm.org (nargothrond.kdm.org [70.56.43.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D9002BCC for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 15:54:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nargothrond.kdm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nargothrond.kdm.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r85FscG9033696; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 09:54:38 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ken@nargothrond.kdm.org) Received: (from ken@localhost) by nargothrond.kdm.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id r85Fscfg033695; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 09:54:38 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ken) Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 09:54:38 -0600 From: "Kenneth D. Merry" To: Bryan Venteicher Subject: Re: camcontrol SCSI sanitize Message-ID: <20130905155438.GA33654@nargothrond.kdm.org> References: <1895443574.3014.1378393339664.JavaMail.root@daemoninthecloset.org> <1292769639.3059.1378394057334.JavaMail.root@daemoninthecloset.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1292769639.3059.1378394057334.JavaMail.root@daemoninthecloset.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 15:54:49 -0000 On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 10:14:17 -0500, Bryan Venteicher wrote: > Hi, > > Anybody with more SCSI experience than myself interested in > reviewing the attached patch that adds SCSI sanitize support > to camcontrol? It has been compiled tested on -current, but > a very similar patch works on 8.x. > > The time is short, but I wouldn't mind sneaking this into 10 > before the code freeze so I have one less local patch to deal > with later. > > http://people.freebsd.org/~bryanv/patches/camcontrol_sanitize.diff Looks good, and pretty much how I would do it. Check it in! Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@FreeBSD.ORG