From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 21 21:54:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248F7106564A; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:54:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [87.229.73.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C659C8FC0C; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:54:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.mypc.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9850614E7F95; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 23:54:22 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at server.mypc.hu Received: from server.mypc.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 2SxiNSatBkXW; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 23:54:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (D94162B4.catv.pool.telekom.hu [217.65.98.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A6D014E7EF5; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 23:54:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <50340388.6@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 23:54:16 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Simon L. B. Nielsen" References: <50326A70.5020009@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: doceng@FreeBSD.org, doc@FreeBSD.org, www@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: doceng... X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:54:24 -0000 Em 21-08-2012 21:57, Simon L. B. Nielsen escreveu: > Does that mean that the role of doceng has changed? In the past doceng has not really been involved in stuff like this (as in, it was much more limited what doceng did for doc compared to what portmgr does for ports). If so, the charter should be updated. (and yes, my implicit hint is that I don't see a point in doceng taking on this new role.) Well, the charter says doceng@ is responsible for the toolchain and the correct functioning of doc and www. It's subjective but I think that keeping the toolset modern and up to date with technology is also part of that functioning. And it seems that mostly hrs@ and I are pushing this stuff and I talked mostly to him about this apart from the public discussions so I associated the subject with doceng@. I don't care too much if I do it "individually" or on behalf of doceng, I just want to see progress. :) Gabor