From owner-freebsd-mobile Thu Feb 18 7:25:53 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from copland.udel.edu (copland.udel.edu [128.175.13.92]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5EA11604 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 1999 07:25:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from earnoth@UDel.Edu) Received: from compaq.my.local.net (lapdog.duch.udel.edu [128.175.54.5]) by copland.udel.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA24766; Thu, 18 Feb 1999 10:24:51 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 10:24:00 -0500 (EST) From: "Eric I. Arnoth" X-Sender: earnoth@compaq.my.local.net To: Gianmarco Giovannelli Cc: mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new laptop, which system? In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990218162613.0098be10@194.184.65.4> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote: > At 09.28 18/02/99 -0500, you wrote: > If you are brave enough I'd suggest go for 4.0-current, but if you use for > a production env. I strongly suggest 3.1-stable. I have no problem at all > at running FreeBSD 4.0-current on my Libretto 50ct and Ast, but I am using > them for fun ... if a day there is a problem is not a critical iussue. > > 2.2.x-stable branch is out of discussion... Bravado has nothing to do with it, my system is mission-critical for my graduate degree. ;) I take it then that 3.1-stable covers all the bases with respect to laptop-support that PAO 2.2.8 does? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message