From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 30 08:40:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E23AF16A4D0 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 08:40:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EAA443D41 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 08:40:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kevin@caomhin.demon.co.uk) Received: from caomhin.demon.co.uk ([62.49.21.186]) by anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1B8MI9-000GEw-0Z for freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:40:45 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:35:26 +0100 To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org From: Kevin Golding References: <002f01c4165c$a0c0d1d0$6f01a8c0@miter.local> <20040330101519.R2711@beck.quonix.net> <1080661480.4341.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Turnpike Integrated Version 5.01 U Subject: Re: The Website X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:40:47 -0000 In article , Jim Zajkowski writes > >On Mar 30, 2004, at 10:44 AM, dereck wrote: > >> 1. I agree with you that it is hard to get management to accept FreeBSD >> - perception is poor, though I'm not quite sure why. > >It's probably the 'Free' part of the name, in all seriousness. Actually that logic extends to a problem which seems to hit *BSD in general - OpenBSD.org is the only site which doesn't have "project" emblazoned across the top of my browser. Granted, the management types most likely to be put off by something trivial like that usually feel their time is too valuable to look at a website; preferring instead a 15 page document justifying everything and anything. Kevin