Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:00:05 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister <jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: phoenix@dsli.com (Kosh) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LINT file? Message-ID: <200403021500.i22F06305259@clunix.cl.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <40440743.9000306@dsli.com> from "Kosh" at Mar 01, 2004 11:02:11 PM
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > fbsd_user wrote: > > >And you think that, that's ok? > > > >Somebody messed up big time removing all the LINT comments. > > > >That's totally unacceptable. > > > >Aren't you going to submit an problem report about that. > > > >That's just so stupid it could not have been done with official > >approval. > > > >There could never be any reason to justify doing that. > > > >If defeats the whole purpose of having the LINT kernel max option > >statement file. > > > >You have to point out these blunder by submitting an problem report. > > > >Get on the stick and do your volunteer part in keeping Freebsd what > >we all expect it to be. > > > > > > > FBSD_USER, > > #1.) FreeBSD is a VOLUNTEER project > > #2.) Who made you in charge or deciding what's acceptable and not ! > > #3.) If you REALLY think it's unacceptable, why not submitt what > comments you think should be in there. > > > > > And if you are unable to understand the programming at all, then may > I suggest that you SHUT THE FUCK UP!! > Oh now that's a really helpful response. Anyway, my 4.9 LINT has comments. I certainly hope to see them when I get to 5.xxx. Without the comments LINT is essentially useless. Just long lists of cryptic character strings are not very helpful, even if there is a man page on every one. ////jerry > > / Flame mode off >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200403021500.i22F06305259>