From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Nov 4 1:51:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from rucus.ru.ac.za (rucus.ru.ac.za [146.231.29.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0336914ECC for ; Thu, 4 Nov 1999 01:51:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bvi@rucus.ru.ac.za) Received: (qmail 18807 invoked by uid 374); 4 Nov 1999 09:54:30 -0000 Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 11:54:30 +0200 From: Barry Irwin To: Shannon Wheeler Cc: Antti Kantee , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: trouble with ntop & 3.3-RELEASE Message-ID: <19991104115430.B64955@rucus.ru.ac.za> References: <04ca01bf261b$7061e6e0$0307070a@shannon-s> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i In-Reply-To: <04ca01bf261b$7061e6e0$0307070a@shannon-s> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed 1999-11-03 (09:45), Shannon Wheeler wrote: > From: Antti Kantee > Date: November 3, 1999 7:48 AM > > > >there to boot it after the crash). With the snapshot release there never > >were any problems, and the box was up 170days in a row. Well that could > >be partly due to the fact that it was running a GENERIC kernel and no > >bpf and therefore no ntop was available ;) > > >Does someone have constructive suggestions apart from pkg_delete ntop? > somthing I've noticed on both my 3.3 release boxes ( PII450 and dual P200) is that ntop happily sits and chews as much cPU as it cn gets its hands on ( even when there is no network traffic) in comparision it uses minimal cpu on my 486 linux box Barry -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Barry Irwin IRC: balin@zanet (#linux) bvi@moria.org http://rucus.ru.ac.za/~bvi Whois BI414 - PMPN8EZ - http://moria.org -------------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message