From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 14 15:06:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 267E816A400 for ; Sun, 14 May 2006 15:06:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from multiplay.co.uk (core6.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8963D43D60 for ; Sun, 14 May 2006 15:06:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from vader ([212.135.219.179]) by multiplay.co.uk (multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (MDaemon.PRO.v8.1.3.R) with ESMTP id md50002556620.msg for ; Sun, 14 May 2006 16:05:04 +0100 Message-ID: <012a01c67767$c74bfaa0$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> From: "Steven Hartland" To: "Robert Huff" , References: <44667EAF.10802@vonostingroup.com> <17511.16810.868922.107073@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 16:04:55 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 X-Spam-Processed: multiplay.co.uk, Sun, 14 May 2006 16:05:04 +0100 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 212.135.219.179 X-Return-Path: killing@multiplay.co.uk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ports@freebsd.org X-MDAV-Processed: multiplay.co.uk, Sun, 14 May 2006 16:05:06 +0100 Cc: Subject: Re: Has the port collection become to large to handle. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 15:06:05 -0000 Robert Huff wrote: > And even if the technolgy works, I understand the position of > the poster who doesn't want others knowing what is installed. At > best it would be optional and on an "opt-in" basis; this means > large numbers of people won't ... and there goes confidence in the > rest of the data. Oh come on guys its an incrementing number no XXX installed this on datetime YYYY. Anyone who's installed some of the more common perl modules will already be using such a system it not like its has any personal info in talk about paranoia. Steve ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone (023) 8024 3137 or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk.